A641 Improvement Scheme

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

This public engagement ran from the 28th November to 6th January 2023, and has now closed.

Thank you to everyone who took part. Responses are being analysed, and further information will be shared here once available.

Please note that all queries sent through the Q&A tool or by email have been captured, however the project team has received a significant amount of queries both before and over the Christmas period, and will respond shortly.

The information below was presented during the public engagement.


Calderdale, Kirklees and Bradford councils are working with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority to improve the A641 between Bradford, Brighouse and Huddersfield.


A video has been produced to explain the different proposals in the scheme:


There are a number of transport related issues in this area. These include congestion (especially around Brighouse), poor air quality and the lack of safe and attractive facilities for people walking, wheeling (wheelchairs, scooters, pushchairs and mobility aids) or cycling.

The scheme supports local businesses, fairer, healthier communities, and less pollution. People will be able to make more active choices for local journeys. Better transport connections will help make the area a greater place to live, work, learn and visit.

The plans and designs for each area can be found using the 'documents, plans and proposals' section of this page.

Our proposals

The proposed interventions seek to provide better connections, better access and better places for communities and all users of the A641.

The schemes have been developed to reflect your feedback from the last consultation in 2021, and you can read about how we’ve responded to your feedback in the You Said, We Did document.

The proposals include:

  • New crossing facilities and easier access to greenways for people walking or wheeling

  • Widening, access and surface improvements to off-road paths and new on-road cycle routes for people choosing to cycle

  • New bus lanes and bus priority measures to improve bus journey times and reliability

  • An enhanced arrival experience and better access to Brighouse Rail Station

  • Signalisation and layout changes to junctions to improve safety and crossings

  • A new river crossing in Brighouse

  • Enhancement to local community areas near to schools to create safe and healthy street environments, which work well for people of all ages to walk, cycle, rest and play.

For the purpose of this consultation the corridor has been split into five areas:

We want your views

We would like to know what you think of our proposals. We will use what you tell us to help us to produce more detailed designs.

You can provide your views via the survey and ask us questions via the Q&A tool.

This consultation will close on 6th January 2023.

You can talk to us in person at Brighouse Bus Station:

  • Saturday 10th December 2022 - 10am-12pm
  • Wednesday 14th December 2022 - 9am-1pm
  • Monday 19th December 2022 - 1pm-5pm

Community Street improvement areas

As part of the scheme, we are developing plans for two Community Street improvement areas to reduce traffic and build safe and healthy environments for people of all ages to walk, cycle, rest and play. One around Shirley Manor Academy in Wyke and the second around St Andrew's Junior School in Brighouse.

We would like ideas from local people to help shape these schemes which is why we’ve created a Commonplace Community Map for each area. These are interactive maps of the local area; you can add your comments and feedback on the maps. The map links below will open a new page. Once you’ve finished on the Commonplace site, please return to this page to complete the A641 consultation survey.

Join us in person to find out more and give your views at the following events:

  • Shirley Manor Academy – 5th January 2023 2-7pm (general public after 4pm)
  • St Andrew’s Junior School – 4th January 2023 2:30-6:30pm (general public after 5pm)

What’s next?

The feedback received through this consultation will be used to inform changes to the scheme during detailed design.

Along with greater design detail, the Final Business Case for the scheme will be developed for submission to West Yorkshire Combined Authority which, if approved, will release funding for construction.

Prior to FBC submission in Summer 2023, further public consultation will be undertaken where plans for the scheme will be shared with an enhanced level of detail.

Subject to approvals, work is planned to start on site in early 2024.


This public engagement ran from the 28th November to 6th January 2023, and has now closed.

Thank you to everyone who took part. Responses are being analysed, and further information will be shared here once available.

Please note that all queries sent through the Q&A tool or by email have been captured, however the project team has received a significant amount of queries both before and over the Christmas period, and will respond shortly.

The information below was presented during the public engagement.


Calderdale, Kirklees and Bradford councils are working with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority to improve the A641 between Bradford, Brighouse and Huddersfield.


A video has been produced to explain the different proposals in the scheme:


There are a number of transport related issues in this area. These include congestion (especially around Brighouse), poor air quality and the lack of safe and attractive facilities for people walking, wheeling (wheelchairs, scooters, pushchairs and mobility aids) or cycling.

The scheme supports local businesses, fairer, healthier communities, and less pollution. People will be able to make more active choices for local journeys. Better transport connections will help make the area a greater place to live, work, learn and visit.

The plans and designs for each area can be found using the 'documents, plans and proposals' section of this page.

Our proposals

The proposed interventions seek to provide better connections, better access and better places for communities and all users of the A641.

The schemes have been developed to reflect your feedback from the last consultation in 2021, and you can read about how we’ve responded to your feedback in the You Said, We Did document.

The proposals include:

  • New crossing facilities and easier access to greenways for people walking or wheeling

  • Widening, access and surface improvements to off-road paths and new on-road cycle routes for people choosing to cycle

  • New bus lanes and bus priority measures to improve bus journey times and reliability

  • An enhanced arrival experience and better access to Brighouse Rail Station

  • Signalisation and layout changes to junctions to improve safety and crossings

  • A new river crossing in Brighouse

  • Enhancement to local community areas near to schools to create safe and healthy street environments, which work well for people of all ages to walk, cycle, rest and play.

For the purpose of this consultation the corridor has been split into five areas:

We want your views

We would like to know what you think of our proposals. We will use what you tell us to help us to produce more detailed designs.

You can provide your views via the survey and ask us questions via the Q&A tool.

This consultation will close on 6th January 2023.

You can talk to us in person at Brighouse Bus Station:

  • Saturday 10th December 2022 - 10am-12pm
  • Wednesday 14th December 2022 - 9am-1pm
  • Monday 19th December 2022 - 1pm-5pm

Community Street improvement areas

As part of the scheme, we are developing plans for two Community Street improvement areas to reduce traffic and build safe and healthy environments for people of all ages to walk, cycle, rest and play. One around Shirley Manor Academy in Wyke and the second around St Andrew's Junior School in Brighouse.

We would like ideas from local people to help shape these schemes which is why we’ve created a Commonplace Community Map for each area. These are interactive maps of the local area; you can add your comments and feedback on the maps. The map links below will open a new page. Once you’ve finished on the Commonplace site, please return to this page to complete the A641 consultation survey.

Join us in person to find out more and give your views at the following events:

  • Shirley Manor Academy – 5th January 2023 2-7pm (general public after 4pm)
  • St Andrew’s Junior School – 4th January 2023 2:30-6:30pm (general public after 5pm)

What’s next?

The feedback received through this consultation will be used to inform changes to the scheme during detailed design.

Along with greater design detail, the Final Business Case for the scheme will be developed for submission to West Yorkshire Combined Authority which, if approved, will release funding for construction.

Prior to FBC submission in Summer 2023, further public consultation will be undertaken where plans for the scheme will be shared with an enhanced level of detail.

Subject to approvals, work is planned to start on site in early 2024.


CLOSED: This discussion has concluded. Please note that all queries sent through the Q&A tool or by email have been captured, however the project team has received a significant amount of queries both before and over the Christmas period, and will respond shortly.

If you have any questions, please let us know below.

Please note, your username and question will be visible to others, so please don't include any personal details.


  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    Will you answer my last question? Thank you, West Yorkshire Authority, which works under the direction of directly elected Councillors, MP's, and Mayors for asnwering my other question about the DFT ownership of the Huddersfield Car Park Development consultation. I was asking about if Local Businesses will be given priority tether in the event of any public money being handed out to contractors in order to complete the construction and instalation of the site, instead of large PFI companies? Local workers should be given priority, alongside SME construction firms based in Yorkshire. Regards, The Youngest Parish Councillor in West Yorkshire.

    NoT_HaroldWilson asked 3 months ago
    Thank your enquiry.  We apologise for the delay in our reply, we’ve received lots of questions and our team is working hard to respond to them all.

    Protecting the Natural Environment is a key strategic driver for the A641 and new tree planting is proposed along the A641 corridor; We are also resolute that every effort will be made to retain existing trees along the route.  Wildflower and species rich grassland will be introduced where possible to bring biodiversity, sustainability and colour into the scheme.

    In respect to your query about local businesses, the A641 project team are committed to ensuring the scheme directly benefits from local skills and boosts employment and growth.  We will work with local and regional partners, including the district procurement teams, to create suitable opportunities to engage with local trades to inform them about upcoming work so they can prepare in advance to maximise opportunities.  We have contracted to deliver a series of ‘Meet the Buyer’ events for local businesses to stimulate access to local procurement and the A641 project team will shape smaller packages of work, where reasonably practical, to make it more be accessible to smaller local businesses to benefit communities within the local economy.  We thank you for your interest and we welcome any thoughts and ideas you might have to help us achieve our ambition. 

    Calderdale Council also work with their partner Go4Growth who offer opportunities to SMEs and VCSE sector to better develop their skills in bidding for public sector business, and their support and events are provided to businesses free of charge. The support includes 121, masterclasses and workshops.
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    Where exactly do you expect people to park their cars in and around Brighouse? You do understand that many residential roads and streets were built in an age when people did not own cars and they therefore do not have driveways on which to park their cars. They need to park on the roads. This obsession with making "relaxing spaces" all in the name of saving the environment is not only impractical but will drive trade away from our lovely town (Brighouse). Why don't you put all this money into improving roads, building car parks and planting trees on green belt instead of building more houses!!

    Simone asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feed back to us your support and concerns about the A641 Improvement Scheme.

    The proposals for the A641 have been developed to deliver a more efficient transport network; prioritise walking, wheeling (e.g. bike, wheelchairs, prams), cycling and public transport; make sure communities are better connected; improve safety and create better quality places whilst also contributing to Calderdale’s response to the Climate Emergency.

    Current plans for the scheme include proposals that will impact on local parking on the highway along certain stretches of the A641. Several options are being explored for alternative parking arrangements. As plans are developed further the team will engage and consult with all residents and businesses directly impacted by the A641 scheme proposals.

    On-street occupancy surveys have been conducted to determine where people are parking and why; the amount of current parking provided within the study area and the number of parking spaces to be displaced. Following analysis of the occupancy surveys, we will then look at where the parking is proposed to be displaced from and where it could be moved to, to determine the next steps. We will be directly contacting those who will be impacted by the current proposals. 

    In addition to speed limit changes at specific locations, the scheme includes several proposals to improve the safety and experience for people walking and cycling in the area including separated cycling facilities on the A641, new and improved off-road greenway routes for walking and cycling.

    The A641 improvement scheme is targeted specifically at improving the A641 highway as well as making some improvements to connecting roads, there are no plans within the scheme for the development of new car parks. Protecting the Natural Environment is a key strategic driver for the A641. New tree planting is proposed as part of the scheme and every effort will be made to retain existing trees.  Wildflower and species rich grassland will be introduced where possible to bring biodiversity, sustainability and colour into the scheme.
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    After reviewing the updated plans for the A641 "improvements", it is apparent that they are driven by an ideological agenda, rather than for the practical benefit of the local population. Previous feedback has clearly been largely ignored and the plans are obviously going to be pushed through no matter what and no matter whether they ultimately just cause misery and chaos for local residents. From just looking at the plans for the area immediately near where I live, there are several glaring mistakes, with existing bus stops being marked in the wrong locations and prominent large buildings being incorrectly labelled. The obvious conclusion is that these plans were most likely designed remotely on computer systems with little actual on site investigation or research. A utopia of green spaces, with a massive reduction in the number of private vehicles and everyone walking, cycling and using public transport instead is just not realistic, although that is clearly the goal of this project, instead of the goal of actually improving the local traffic system. For a start, cycling in this area is not a practical option for many due to very hilly terrain, poor weather and the high risk of bike theft. And what about the elderly and infirm who rely heavily on their cars? Added to this, removing on street parking for hundreds of households on or immediately next to the A641 is just not practical or reasonable. Another decision that clearly was taken without visiting the affected areas in person and properly investigating the issues it would raise. All these issues are compounded by the ongoing plans to add many thousands of new houses in the Brighouse area in the immediate vicinity of the A641, despite the already overstretched infrastructure. All in all, this is almost certainly going to be an absolute mess if a serious rethink is not done and the goals of the project aren't re-evaluated honestly. Is there any chance of anyone taking genuine heed of the issues raised and revising these plans before it is too late?

    Local Resident asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feed back to us your concerns about the A641 Improvement Scheme.

    The proposals for the A641 have been developed to deliver a more efficient transport network; prioritise walking, wheeling (e.g. bike, wheelchairs, prams), cycling and public transport; make sure communities are better connected; improve safety and create better quality places to support Calderdale Council's priorities whilst also contributing to Calderdale’s response to the Climate Emergency. 

    Current plans for the scheme include proposals that will impact on local parking on the highway along certain stretches of the A641. Several options are being explored for alternative parking arrangements. As plans are developed further the team will engage and consult with all residents and businesses directly impacted by the A641 scheme proposals. 

    On-street occupancy surveys will initially be conducted to determine where people are parking and why; the amount of current parking provided within the study area and the number of parking spaces to be displaced. Following analysis of the occupancy surveys, we will then look at where the parking is proposed to be displaced from and where it could be moved to, to determine the next steps. We will be directly contacting those who will be impacted by the current proposals. 

    In addition to speed limit changes at specific locations, the scheme includes several proposals to improve the safety and experience for people walking and cycling in the area including separated cycling facilities on the A641, new and improved off-road greenway routes for walking and cycling.

    As part of the development of the A641 scheme, there has been close engagement with Calderdale Council's Planning Team who are working on the development of proposals contained within the Local Plan, including the growth in Brighouse you refer to. Traffic modelling which has taken place as part of the A641 scheme development has also considered the future impact on the road network and being taken into consideration.
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    In area D you mention creating a quiet road between Crossley street and Stratton Close to connect Lords Lane to Woodhouse. I am very concerned about the cyclists as there could easily be collisions when people like myself pull out of our driveways and potentially make contact with a cyclist speeding down the steep hill on Stratton close. I am also concerned that if the path was for both pedestrians and cyclists then this too could have the potential to cause accidents. The bottom of Stratton close is not a wide road and I don’t understand how the suggestion of using it for pedestrians, bikes and cars at the same time would be plausible. Stratton close does not have street lamps at the bottom making visibility even worse at night, exacerbating these problems.

    Stratton Close Resident asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feedback on the A641 improvement scheme engagement.  We really appreciate you bringing this concern to our attention. The design for this particular intervention is for a dual use/shared space (for both cyclists and pedestrians). The recommended widths for shared use routes under the current guidelines are that there must be at a minimum of 3.0 metres for pedestrians and cyclists, with the current proposed design being at a minimum of 4.0 metres. Due to the nature of shared use facilities and mixing people walking and cycling together increasing the likelihood of interactions, cyclists usually travel slower within them.
    Features located within a shared use facility can have the effect of reducing the effective width by cycles ‘shying’ away from physical features due to the risk of handlebars, pedals and stirrups striking vertical features situated alongside the path edge. ‘Shy’ distances are more applicable to people on bikes and horse riders than other path users. This means that cyclists will generally ‘shy’ away from the wall of the property boundary allowing more separation when egressing, therefore, reducing risk of a conflict.
    Where the physical environment allows or encourages faster cycling speeds, property access and egress may be diminished, therefore, we will ensure that the necessary physical separation and calming measures are implemented to reduce risk of conflict between egressing cars/cyclists, and encourage slower cycling speeds.
    Your feedback relating to poor visibility due to lack of street lamps will be shared with the design team for consideration during design development. 
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    1. Why are the opinions of 1.3% of the local population enough to be used to implement such massive changes in the local area? 2.What is the current cycling use In brighouse and what is the expected cycling use after changes have been made in brighouse? 3.What is the current vehicle traffic use in brighouse and what is th expected vehicle traffic use in brighouse going to be in the future, bearing in mind there are plans for thousands of new houses in the local area. 4.What is the current traffic flow rate at Tesco roundabout and what will the expected traffic flow rate be after signals have been introduced at Tesco roundabout? 5. Will you place temporary traffic lights at Tesco roundabout for a period of time to test the impact of signals on the flow of traffic? 6. Can you provide data from Bradford on the impact prioritising cycling over vehicle traffic has had on the use of cycling in Bradford? 7. Please don't ruin our town for a utopian dream of cyclists floating around without a care in the world, saving the environment while thousands of Cars sit idle in traffic around them. Efficiency and the consistent flow of traffic away from the town centre must be a top priority.

    Jason Briggs asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feedback on the A641 improvement scheme engagement. The A641 project seeks to introduce safe and usable spaces for non-motorised users, encouraging a positive modal shift and reducing congestion. Surveys are to be carried out later this year regarding vehicle and cycling numbers, however, with limited safe facilities for people who choose to walk and cycle, the corridor lacks the appeal for anyone but the most confident road cyclist.  

    Temporary signals are not used to determine impacts of future schemes, instead traffic modelling of all the proposals is being carried out on the affected junctions. This modelling is on-going across the A641 scheme and the results will feed into the next stage of detailed design.  A further public consultation exercise will be held later this year with more detailed designs, which will have been updated to reflect the outcome of modelling and feedback from consultation responses, available for review and comment.

    Advertisement of this future consultation will be released via Calderdale Council Social Media and Calderdale Next Chapter website: calderdalenextchapter.co.uk, there will be a press release and advertisements in the local paper, on posters along A641 and surrounding areas as well as other advertisement methods. A large range of advertisement methods will be used to promote this consultation with the aim of engaging with as many local residents and businesses as possible. Before this consultation takes place, members of the public and businesses who will be directly impacted by the scheme will be contacted by the project team for further discussions.

    As part of the development of the A641 scheme, there has been close engagement with Calderdale Council's Planning Team who are working on the development of proposals contained within the Local Plan, including the growth in Brighouse you refer to. Traffic modelling which has taken place as part of the A641 scheme development has also considered the future impact on the road network and being taken into consideration.
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    When were shops and businesses in the town of Brighouse which these plans will affect going to be told about this? Please answer

    Oliver asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your feedback.

    Following this public engagement to get feedback on the preferred option (as confirmed through feedback from the previous consultation) which will feed into the detailed design of the scheme we will set about contacting those impacted by the scheme. It is important to get an understanding of what the interventions are following public opinion before contacting residents and businesses. Those affected by the scheme will be contacted in the coming months.
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    Not really a question - more an observation re traffic island improvements to traffic island adjacent to Daisy Road, Brighouse. Good Morning to whom it concerns I was responsible for getting the councillors onside regarding the traffic island adjacent to Daisy Road off Huddersfield Road. There were accidents and pedestrians getting injured attempting to cross the road to get to Woodhouse School and the new housing estates at that time. It was dangerous. Alas, I had experience of this first hand… This traffic island was put into place well over 30 years ago. It was a massive improvement and saved many lives and further accidents. The inclusion of a school lollypop man was a very good move also. However it all turned sour when cars started to park on Huddersfield Road by the traffic island. This was the most stupid decision imaginable… It caused untold near-misses and became a blind spot for pedestrians and motorists alike using Daisy Road. It has become just as dangerous as it was before. In fact, more so now the road is used as a speed track. Any further alterations to the traffic island to help promote road safety must include more parking restrictions on Huddersfield Road. If this is not done asap you are wasting your time and our money. I have lived here 55 years and am happy to discuss this issue at your convenience. In summary, improve the traffic island by all means, but with more car parking restrictions on Huddersfield Road in order to give a clear vision, for vehicles and pedestrians alike, of traffic coming up Huddersfield Road at break neck speed. Then this will save lives and limbs. David R

    David R. asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feedback on the A641 improvement scheme engagement. We really appreciate the amount of detail you have provided about the issues around the traffic Island adjacent to Daisy Road. We will share this with the team designing the scheme to consider during the detailed design process

    For your reference there will be a further consultation on the detailed design proposals for the A641 improvement scheme, taking place later this year and we would love you to also provide any feedback then.

    Advertisement of this consultation will be released via Calderdale Council Social Media & Calderdale Next Chapter website: calderdalenextchapter.co.uk, there will be a press release and advertisements in the local paper, on posters along A641 and surrounding areas as well as other advertisement methods.

    If you would like the opportunity to discuss this issue in further detail with a member of the project team please email your contact details and reference the issue you have raised here to thenextchapter@calderdale.gov.uk
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    A large part of the proposal focuses on reducing congestion in Brighouse. What studies, if any, have been carried out to show that the proposed works will reduce congestion? The proposal seems to suggest that the answer is to reduce the number of cars on the road by increasing access for cycling and public transport etc. The seems a very idealist view when in reality the number of cars on the road will remain unaffected by this and the congestion issue will remain with a series of new cycling paths that will be mostly unused for 6 months of the year and a lot of annoyed residents who have to find alternative parking arrangements. Also the answer to the parking displacement on Bradford Road seems to "we're going to cross that bridge when we get there", all the while the proposals are being pushed ahead. I cannot see how all the parking on Bradford Road is going to be relocated, there simply isn't the space. Unless the council is also planning to build a series of multistory car parks along Bradford Road too?

    Chris1 asked 3 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feed back to us your support and concerns about the A641 Improvement Scheme.

    The proposals for the A641 have been developed to deliver a more efficient transport network; prioritise walking, wheeling (e.g. bike, wheelchairs, prams), cycling and public transport; make sure communities are better connected; improve safety and create better quality places whilst also contributing to Calderdale’s response to the Climate Emergency.

    Current plans for the scheme include proposals that will impact on local parking on the highway along certain stretches of the A641. Several options are being explored for alternative parking arrangements. As plans are developed further the team will engage and consult with all residents and businesses directly impacted by the A641 scheme proposals.

    On-street occupancy surveys will initially be conducted to determine where people are parking and why; the amount of current parking provided within the study area and the number of parking spaces to be displaced. Following analysis of the occupancy surveys, we will then look at where the parking is proposed to be displaced from and where it could be moved to, to determine the next steps. We will be directly contacting those who will be impacted by the current proposals. 

    In addition to speed limit changes at specific locations, the scheme includes several proposals to improve the safety and experience for people walking and cycling in the area including separated cycling facilities on the A641, new and improved off-road greenway routes for walking and cycling.

    The A641 project seeks to deliver a more efficient and safer transport network for all by introducing safe and usable spaces for non-motorised users, thus encouraging a positive modal shift and reducing congestion. Surveys are to be carried out later in the year regarding vehicle and cycling numbers, however, with limited safe infrastructure currently available for sustainable travel modes, the corridor lacks the appeal for anyone but the most confident road cyclist.
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    How many cyclist currently use this route and how many current car users have said they would convert to cycling to work if road improvements were put in place?

    Aes asked 4 months ago
    Unfortunately, we cannot provide an answer to your question about how many cyclists currently use the route as there is currently no cycling lane provisions along the A641 highway. On highway cycling along Bradford Road is unsafe due to the number of cars parked along much of the route. This, combined with few formalised pedestrian crossing points, resulting in people crossing the roads from between parked cars, making it an unsafe route for cyclists to use. 

    To try and reduce car use for environmental reasons, and improve public health, the Council are actively encouraging people to cycle. This approach supports national, regional and local policy. Cycling can bring huge health benefits and is relatively a cheap way to travel for many people, therefore increasing opportunities for all. Many cyclists are killed or seriously injured on our roads and these facilities proposed as part of the A641 scheme are built to protect them. 

    The proposals for the A641 have been developed to deliver a more efficient transport network; prioritising walking, wheeling (e.g. bike, wheelchairs, prams), cycling and public transport; make sure communities are better connected; improve safety and create better quality places whilst also contributing to Calderdale’s response to the Climate Emergency. There have been a series of consultations during the development of the A641 scheme and feedback from these has been fed into the development of design plans.

    Where we have previously upgraded or provided fit for purpose cycling facilities, we have seen an increased uptake in the use of those facilities, and one of the key aims of providing these facilities is to encourage more new cyclists to do the same. 
  • Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    Has the proposed new M62 Junction where it crosses the A641 been scraped?

    nickmacuk asked 4 months ago
    Thank you for taking the time to feed back your query about the A641 Improvement Scheme.

    At present there have not previously nor are there intended to be any designs with which there is a junction for the A641 to meet the M62. If you would like to discuss this in any further detail please could you provide some more specifics around you initial query and we would be more than happy to discuss any further queries you might have. 
Page last updated: 10 Jan 2023, 10:05 AM